While watching TV last night, I realized exactly how much Lost, most notably the end of Lost, has changed television forever.
While watching my guilty pleasure reality competition show America’s Got Talent, NBC was running a commercial which, as a defunct Lost devotee, caught my interest.
The show is called Persons Unknown and immediately puts off the mystery/thriller show vibe. It seems to be something like The Real World meets Saw; a bunch of people are kidnapped and put in a house full of cameras. More than likely they will be forced to make some sort of insane moral choices to save that which they hold dear. Notable example in the trailer was forcing one woman to shoot her “neighbor” in the room next door in order to save her daughter’s life, tears streaking down her face as she holds the gun on an innocent man.
Surely, this will be another compartmentalized character-driven drama involving strangers getting to know each other and either effecting escape or survival.
Of course, they give you no hint as to who these people are or why they’ve been collected or even where they really are.
Has Lost influenced this show? It’s painfully apparent. However, the influence of one show on another doesn’t really say that it changed television forever.
Within the first few moments of the promo, after a few mysterious images are shown, the voice-over announcer graciously makes a promise to the viewer on behalf of the network:
“By the end of the summer, there will be answers!”
This is how Lost has changed television forever.
I’m sure that many of we former Losties, coming off the ending of a show which we happily donated our time, speculation, and anticipation to, were afraid to put our feet back into the water to another mystery show. A comforting statement, assuring us there will be answers, is the only real way to get the largely disenchanted target audience to invest in such a show so soon after feeling duped and disappointed by an ending so unsatisfactory for everything the show had built around itself.
Was I disappointed in the Lost ending? A week and a few days after watching it, I’m here to tell you that I absolutely was.
It took that long to actually let the feelings sink in; to allow my mind to navigate around the emotional traps set for devoted viewers by the writers. It was the old bait and switch routine. They thought that by giving us every heart-pumping, tear-jerking, impossible-due-to-death reunion that we would forget about all of the questions we really wanted to see answered within the two-and-a-half hour damn near feature length finale.
Tugging on my heartstrings did work for the first few days. I was telling people that I was satisfied. This was largely based in reality. The finality for the characters was somewhat pleasing. The more I thought about it though, the more I realized that the whole two-point-five hour affair was just to pull the wool over my eyes. It was distracting me from one painful fact which, it seemed, all Lost fans didn’t want to admit: the writers sucked.
Argue with me if you will about the sanctity of your precious Darlton (that’s the celeb-couple name for head writers Damon Lindeloff and Carlton Cuse to the uninitiated), they were handed the show by a disenchanted J.J. Abrams and had no freaking clue as to what to do. This had been painfully apparent since season three and still we watched. We watched and kept telling ourselves that it would all make sense in the end. We kept making ourselves believe that, someday, all of our questions would be answered.
When they announced that season six would be the last of it, we all thought that every show would be answer after answer until the big shocking (completely satisfying) conclusion. What we got was a bag full of wet farts and a kick in the ass for being suckers.
The necessity of the promise of answers is how Lost has changed television.
How Lost should change television I will detail in the following letter.
Dear Television Writers,
DON’T FREAKING LISTEN TO FANS OR THE INTERNET!!!
No one on the internet knows better than you do what the story should be.
If you happen to write something which establishes a fandom, there will obviously be people who think they can do your job better than you. They will gather other people, like-minded, via forums and form movements. If they think the two new characters you (seemingly) randomly introduced in the middle of season two who happened to be on the beach but never really surfaced before suck balls, they’re going to tell you that those characters suck balls. They’re going to launch a movement and force you to write those two characters off the show. And, you’re going to do it, aren’t you? You’re going to do it for fear of alienating the viewers involved in that movement because they may make up a large portion of a particular money-making demographic. You’re going to do it because pressure will be on the network to keep the show performing or else.
You are going to sacrifice the integrity of the overall story because a bunch of wanna-be slash-fic writers within your fandom can raise a virtual army to rail against the direction you feel your tale needs to go. They can protest and threaten to boycott if things don’t change to their preference. They probably won’t, but it’s the threat that counts.
It doesn’t matter to any of them if they would have played some sort of master role in your magnum opus because they can’t see the big picture like you can. They only think that they’re seeing through some sort of sham to keep people interested in the show by bringing new blood into the cast.
Of course, that may have really been a sham, but that’s not the point.
I’m just using Nikki and Paulo on Lost as an example here.
Another Lost example might be the explanation of the Smoke Monster.
Could it have been nanites, Darlton? Would that have been a satisfactory explanation? Sure. Up until possibly season four, it would have been perfectly valid and acceptable. Some DHARMA experiment gone haywire would have been a great way to keep things, pardon the expression, more real.
Instead, you listened to the fans. A bunch of them came to you at press conferences and asked if it was nanites. You said maybe. They said: “Well, if it’s nanites, then that’s a stupid bullshit answer.” So, you said: “Oh, then it’s not nanites.”
So, what did we get instead of a plausible pseudo-scientific explanation? We got a dude in a black shirt getting chucked down a shiny hole in some two-digit year AD. Do you tell us what, precisely, the fuck was going on there? No. So, rather than appease all of your fans with a solid answer, you slide around the point and try to appease a portion of the fans who would have been upset with what was probably your original explanation.
Does this work? No. You wound up pissing off all of your fans rather than the small portion who cried bullshit back in the day by giving us a non-explanation.
I can understand the pressure you feel. As a fiction writer, I’m always looking for feedback from my few loyal readers. I always want to hear what they’d like to see done differently. I like to know which characters they’re fans of so that I can put more time and effort into their development.
There is one key difference between your body of work and mine, and it’s not just the fact that you’re on network and I’m on nothing: My story isn’t finished yet.
I know, yours may not have been, either, when you ended the first season, and that’s fine. But, you’re in the public eye. You’ve got one of the most watched television dramas of the last 25 years. Try to at least make it look like you know what you’re doing instead of catering to portions of your fanbase by essentially making things up as you go along. They’re devoted. They’re not going to go anywhere, no matter how much they posture. Your ratings would have stayed intact if you’d have at least thrown us a bone back in season one. Instead, you present us with questions which would go unanswered for the entire distance of the show. Questions which weren’t hard to answer in the first place, but you made them hard to answer. You made it so that there would be no plausible, simple, one-line explanation for everything and you thought that every reveal, no matter how big or small, deserved its own episode.
I am disappointed in you.
But, you have changed TV forever.
Now, they HAVE to give us answers. They have to promise us answers to get us to watch because we don’t want to invest six years of our time in a bunch of bullshit mysteries again.
Keep fighting the good fight.
Justin, i know we disagree alot in certain areas of our friendship, but when it comes to your Blog and your opinions on Art, and Pop Culture i Usually agree with you 100%, However on this issue i am really disapointed in you.
Dont take this the wrong way, but I think lost was an excellent story, at first i didnt know what to think about the ending either, and i went through times where i wanted more, and times where i was satisfied. My personal opinion on the matter and why so many “losties” are disapointed is 2 fold dynamic. the first portion lost has trained us to want more…since season one everytime we learn something, we get 2 questions to replace the one we just got answered, so like pavlovs dog, we get an answer and we salavate awaiting more…so the show has simply trained us to not be satisfied…compile that with the Sci-Fi fan base that this show has attracted (and i believe to be the most Vocal about the show) Sci-Fi fans generally pride themselves on being intelligent, and espically on the internet they whip out their e-peen, so if the masses are satisfied with the ending of the show the “cool” thing to do is bitch and complain and say how unsatisfied they are because they are too intelligent for such a trivial ending…These things happen ALL THE TIME in the Sci-Fi and general Geek communities on the internet, everyones gotta hate because hateing has become an internet sign of higher intelligence.
We can talk about this off of here, but What Questions were Sooo important that didnt get answered? Were you really disapointed in the smoke monster? I dunno bro…i’m stickin by the show i was happy, i still want more, and i definately wasnt satisfied…but being happy with an ending and being satisfied are 2 different things in my opinion
anyways thats my 2 cents, love ya bro….by the way I have yer blog linked on my Page now with a cool little logo
It wasn’t as much a rant on the ending. As I said, emotionally, it was satisfying. I was wholly content for a few days. The more I thought about it, though, the more I felt cheated.
Smoke monster is one thing. Who built the Temple? Who built the statue? Both answerable with one or two lines of dialogue during Across the Sea (the MIB/Jacob flashback ep). Why, when, and how is DHARMA still dropping food on the island when they know that it’s been largely abandoned? Why did Hurley wake up one day able to see dead people? What were the rules and who had to play by them? What the F was Walt doing running through the jungle talking backwards? What the F did the Others do with Walt when they had him? What was the secret recipe to Mr. Cluck’s Chicken? What was a real, valid explanation of the numbers besides the Season 1 ARG that very few people caught on to or understood and may or may not have been canon? Why the hell did the Island heal people? What was Eloise Hawking-Widmore’s deal and why did she seem to be some sort of “timebroker” type entity? If no one could find the Island and no one knew about the Island, how did DHARMA even know where to look or why to build the Lighthouse in the first place? Speaking of lighthouses, what was with Jacob’s Lighthouse with the mirrors? Does the “protector of the Island” gain some kind of knowledge when they drink the wine/water/crappy puddle shit, or are they left to guess at everything? Who the F was shooting at the Losties from the other outrigger in season five and why (another question explainable in two or less lines of dialogue)?
That’s just a few off the top of my head.
Yes, I was especially choked up when Sawyer and Juliet kissed because they were two of my favorite characters an two great tastes that tasted great together. Yes, it gave great closure to the characters (except for my burning desire to see a spin-off called “The Adventures of Ben and Hurley”). Yes, the show still stands as an awesome sci-fi/mystery/thriller/character-driven drama.
My problem is with the writers. They did what I said in the rant. They listened to people on the internet. They let the fandom change their vision. For every person who cries out for change, there are five who will pick up on the copout when change occurs. That’s why so many people like me are angry with the ending.
The fans are fickle in asking for answers but, when faced with a possible answer, they say that the answer is stupid and they want a better one. The writers were dumb for allowing themselves to get into that predicament. They were even dumber for bowing to the demands of one section of fandom and changing their minds mid-stream.
Yeah, people can whip out their e-peen and explain things. The problem with that is, outside of the scope of the show itself, all it becomes is fan-fic and nothing more. Without the actual writers confirming, saying “yes, this is this and that is that”, without something within the actual canon of the show.
I realize that, like Locke and Jack long after, we must be Men of Faith in this instance. But, this is not a religion. This isn’t the Island. This is reality. I am a Man of Faith to some extent but, as a writer observing another person’s story, I must be a Man of Science.
If the writers told me the sky was pink, I would believe it. Without that information, I’m left to assume it’s blue even if their intention was for it to always be pink. If they change it to pink later on to fit the story, then it’s bullshit.
Based on this, here’s how the conversation would go.
Me: “It was always supposed to be blue, why didn’t you say it was pink to begin with if it was so important? Why did it suddenly change to pink if it was blue all along?”
The Writers: “Oh, well… uh… it suddenly turned pink because, um… Hey, look! Sawyer’s making out with Juliet! Ben’s redeeming himself! The bad guy is dead! Isn’t that what you wanted?”
Me: “Well, yeah, but it doesn’t explain why the sky suddenly changed to pink. Was it sunrise or sunset or something?”
The Writers: “Well, it wasn’t sunset or sunrise… um… the sky was just pink. Can’t you just deal with it?”
And on and on.
That’s the bullshit that I’m upset about. Not the emotionally rewarding character ending which was still sort of a cop out but not really that bad after all was said and done. Don’t lay a foundation, put up a couple of beams, and abandon the building, y’know?
I have looked more into things and i must admit i was wrong…I now am too disapointed with the ending, there are actually ALOT of questions I have….